Green New Deal Inflames Debate         03/25 06:39

   To Democratic supporters, the Green New Deal is a touchstone, a call to arms 
to combat climate change with the full measure of the nation's resources and 
technological might, but to Republican opponents, the much-hyped plan is a 
dystopian nightmare.

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- To Democratic supporters, the Green New Deal is a 
touchstone, a call to arms to combat climate change with the full measure of 
the nation's resources and technological might. "A mission to save all of 
creation," in the words of Massachusetts Sen. Edward Markey, one the plan's 
lead authors.

   To Republican opponents, the much-hyped plan is a dystopian nightmare, a 
roadmap to national bankruptcy in pursuit of zealous environmentalism. "A big 
green bomb" for the economy, says Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming.

   Lost in the clamor is the reality that, if passed, the Green New Deal would 
require the government to do absolutely nothing. It exists only as a nonbinding 
resolution because Democrats have yet to fill in the potentially treacherous 
details of how to pay for the Green New Deal, how to carry it out and what, 
exactly, it will do.

   Announced to great fanfare in February, the Green New Deal calls for a 
"10-year national mobilization" on the scale of the original New Deal to shift 
the U.S. economy away from fossil fuels such as oil and coal and replace them 
with renewable sources such as wind and solar power. It calls for meeting "100 
percent of the power demand in the United States through clean, renewable and 
zero-emission energy sources," including nuclear power.

   The plan has broad support among Democratic activists, and all six of the 
2020 presidential contenders serving in the Senate have signed on as 
co-sponsors, putting it at the forefront of the party's sprawling primary race.

   Republicans have mocked the Green New Deal as a progressive pipedream that 
would drive the economy off a cliff and lead to a huge tax increase. They call 
it more evidence of the creep of "socialism" in the Democratic Party, along 
with "Medicare for All" and a sweeping elections reform package that would 
allow public financing of congressional campaigns.

   Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who has scheduled a vote 
on the resolution next week, has led the GOP's assault on the Green New Deal, 
jabbing at it repeatedly at news conferences and in floor speeches.

   "Just a good old-fashioned, state-planned economy. Garden-variety 
20th-century socialism," McConnell said in a recent speech. "Our Democratic 
colleagues have taken all the debunked philosophies of the last hundred years, 
rolled them into one giant package, and thrown a little 'green' paint on them 
to make them look new."

   Utah Rep. Rob Bishop went further, calling the proposal "tantamount to 
genocide" for rural America and warning it could outlaw hamburgers, among other 
things.

   In truth, the text of the resolution makes no reference to banning cows, but 
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York --- the main Democratic co-sponsor 
with Markey --- has said in interviews that the U.S. has "got to address 
factory farming" to combat climate change.

   McConnell and other Republicans frequently cite a whopping $93 trillion 
price tag for the resolution, a figure derived from a right-leaning think tank 
that even its author says is overly precise. President Donald Trump has rounded 
that up to $100 trillion and warns it would "shut down American energy."

   The attacks have succeeded in putting Democrats on the spot, with some 
backing the resolution, others downplaying it as aspirational and those in 
positions of power --- such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi --- calling it one 
proposal among many to address climate change.

   Ocasio-Cortez and the other backers are undeterred. They insist the nation 
can eliminate carbon emissions by 2030 --- a target most experts call 
unrealistic --- and say a transformation of the nation's energy use is simply a 
matter of political will.

   "Leader McConnell thinks the Green New Deal is just a resolution, but the 
Green New Deal is a revolution," said Markey. "The Green New Deal has struck a 
powerful chord in this country, and it is igniting the movement of young people 
who are ready to make this the organizing issue for their generation."

   The plan goes far beyond energy to urge national health care coverage and 
job guarantees, high-quality education and affordable housing, as well as 
"upgrading all existing buildings in the United States" to be energy-efficient.

   In calling for a vote, McConnell hopes to test how far Senate Democrats --- 
including the presidential candidates --- are willing to go to accede to the 
party's newly empowered liberal wing, at the risk of leaving moderate voters 
behind.

   Major labor unions, traditionally aligned with Democrats, oppose the plan. 
The AFL-CIO says it makes promises "that are not achievable or realistic," 
adding that the union "will not stand by and allow threats to our members' jobs 
and their families' standard of living go unanswered."

   Democrats hope to thwart McConnell by voting "present" on the resolution. 
The idea is to signal their disgust at what they call a "sham" vote that seeks 
to quash public debate by blocking public hearings or expert testimony about 
the consequences of inaction on climate change.

   "We know they don't like the Green New Deal," Senate Democratic leader Chuck 
Schumer said of Republicans. "But what is their plan then?"

   Jason Grumet, president of the independent Bipartisan Policy Center, said 
climate change has inspired "magical thinking" on both sides of the political 
divide.

   "Most members of the Republican Party believe that climate change is real 
but tend to avert their eyes when people say it's not, because why pick up the 
fight?" Grumet said at a Senate hearing this month.

   And most Democrats "know we're not going to eliminate fossil fuels in 10 
years or go to 100 percent renewables" as power sources, he said. "But they 
kind of avert their eyes because that's where the energy of the party is and 
nobody wants to be on the wrong end. And we just end up ceding to the edges" of 
both parties. 


(KA)